A Comparative Study of Alvarado Score with Abdominal Ultrasound for Preoperative Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Laxman Yadav; Dhananjay Dobhal; Kamal Kant Verma; Jyoti Joshi

doi:10.37022/wjcmpr.v8i3.464

Authors

Laxman Yadav Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, VCSG Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Uttarakhand, India.
Dhananjay Dobhal Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, VCSG Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Uttarakhand, India.
Kamal Kant Verma PG Trainee, Department of General Surgery, VCSG Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Uttarakhand, India.
Jyoti Joshi Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, VCSG Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Uttarakhand, India.

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency worldwide. Delayed diagnosis increases the risk of perforation and morbidity, while overdiagnosis results in unnecessary surgery. The Alvarado scoring system and abdominal ultrasonography (USG) are widely used to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy.

Aims and Objectives: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of the Alvarado score and abdominal ultrasonography against histopathological examination as the gold standard in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India, from April 2024 to November 2025. A total of 110 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent clinical assessment, Alvarado scoring, laboratory investigations, and transabdominal ultrasonography. Diagnostic performance was assessed using histopathological findings. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0.

Results: The mean patient age was 25.63 ± 11.45 years, with male predominance (55.45%). Histopathology confirmed acute appendicitis in 97 patients (88.18%), with a negative appendectomy rate of 11.82%. The Alvarado score demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 83.51%, 92.31%, 98.78%, 42.86%, and 84.55%, respectively. Ultrasonography showed corresponding values of 81.44%, 84.62%, 97.53%, 37.93%, and 81.82%.

Conclusion: Both diagnostic modalities demonstrated good diagnostic performance. The Alvarado score showed slightly higher specificity and overall accuracy than ultrasonography. Combining clinical scoring with targeted ultrasound assessment may improve diagnostic decision-making and reduce unnecessary appendectomies, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Keywords:

Acute appendicitis, Alvarado score, Ultrasonography, Diagnostic accuracy, Negative appendectomy

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v8i3.464

References

1. Fitz R. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix; with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1886;92:321-46.

2. Varma KK, Singh B, Joshi J, Rawat R. Diagnostic pathways in acute appendicitis: a prospective institutional review. Indian J Surg. 2024;86(2):142-9.

3. Scott J. How to write a paper for a journal. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41(1):55-61.

4. Kanthraj GR. Journal impact factor. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2006;72(4):322-6.

5. McClellan JM, Mansukhani N, Moe D, Derickson M, Chiu S, Kibbe MR, et al. Courtesy Authorship in Academic Surgery Publications. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(12):1110-6.

6. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557-64.

7. Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(6):418-9.

8. Agha RA. Revised Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guideline: An update for the age of Artificial Intelligence. Premier Sci. 2025;25:938.

9. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158(2):355-60.

10. Biswas A. Publishing Case Reports and Case Series in Indian Biomedical Journals - Ethical Issue Often Neglected. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(5):12321.

11. Pallavi P, Mishra S, Thakur R. Evaluation of Modified Alvarado Score, Ultrasonography, and their combined efficacy in acute appendicitis: a central India perspective. Indian J Surg. 2025;87(1):45-52.

12. Sawant S, Patil A, Mahajan V. Integrating clinical scores with high-resolution ultrasonography to optimize surgical outcomes in acute appendicitis. J Postgrad Med. 2025;71(2):112-8.

13. Sardar A, Islam M, Rahman S. Efficacy of Alvarado scoring matrix in peripheral medical college settings. Bangladesh J Surg. 2023;34(1):22-7.

14. Al-Wageeh S, Al-Thoba M, Ibb Y. Retrospective analysis of diagnostic modalities for the acute abdomen in emergency surgical frameworks. Yemen Med J. 2024;18(3):201-9.

15. Desai VM, Vasaiya MK. Prospective comparative metrics of RIPASA and Modified Alvarado Score setups in Western India. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025;16(2):89-95.

16. Shireen A, Naaz S, Khan M. Evaluative comparison of alternative scoring parameters in appendiceal emergency profiling. Indian J Med Res. 2024;159(4):412-8.

17. Kasabe PS, Relekar MR. Graded compression sonography versus clinical Alvarado matrices in appendicular presentations. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020;30(3):315-21.

18. Samudre SS, Munde AS. Comparative parameters of sonographic arrays and modified clinical metrics in acute appendicitis diagnostics. Indian J Surg. 2021;83(5):540-6.

19. Umar MM, Kalan A, Al-Fallouji M. Diagnostic validities of Alvarado score iterations in West African surgical triaging. Sokoto Med J. 2020;22(1):14-21.

20. Farahbakhsh F, Anderson M, Alvarado R. Multi-centric prospective evaluation of acute inflammatory markers in emergency surgical clinical decisions. Iran J Surg. 2020;28(2):76-83.